Composition of 7th Central Pay Commission - PM has approved the composition of 7th CPC under the Chairmanship of Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur...
Composition of 7th Central Pay Commission - PM has approved the composition of 7th CPC under the Chairmanship of Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur...
Prime Minister Approves Composition of 7th Central Pay Commission Under the Chairmanship of Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur, Retired Judge of the Supreme Court and Retired Chairman, Armed Forces Tribunal
The Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram has issued the following statement:
“The Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission as follows:
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
04-February-2014 13:27 IST
Prime Minister Approves Composition of 7th Central Pay Commission Under the Chairmanship of Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur, Retired Judge of the Supreme Court and Retired Chairman, Armed Forces Tribunal
The Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram has issued the following statement:
“The Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission as follows:
| 1. | Shri Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur (Retired Judge of the Supreme Court and Retired Chairman, Armed Forces Tribunal) | Chairman |
| 2. | Shri Vivek Rae (Secretary, Petroleum & Natural Gas) | Member (Full Time) |
| 3. | Dr. Rathin Roy (Director, NIPFP) | Member (Part Time) |
| 4. | Smt. Meena Agarwal (OSD, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance)” | Secretary |
Source: PIB News
Click to view the Finance Ministry Order on Terms of Reference of 7th CPC
Comments
IN ISRO ORGANISATION FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANT FOR DIPLOMA HOLDERS GIVING 4600 GRADE PAY THAT MEANS 17140/-(TOTAL BASIC)FOR THOSE WHO ARE APPOINTING NEW BUT FOR SAME QUALIFICATION(THAT MEANS DIPLOMA HOLDERS)IN OTHER ORGANISATION LIKE "DRDO,RAILWAY,CPWD,CWC,MES,ORDANCE FECTORIES,AND OTHER CENTRAL GOVT ORGANISATIONS GIVING 4200 GRADE PAY THAT MEANS TOTAL BASIC 13500/-PLEASE MAKE IT CORRECT FOR GRADE PAY AND SALARY FOR SAME DIPLOMA QUALIFICATION...
Honourable Chairman 7th CPC
You are hereby requested to remove grade pay anomalies and entitlement based on grade pay instead of basic-pay for various official benefit/facilities. The entitlement granted in the 5th CPC
based on basic pay has awarded CGE a better off state than that of the 6th CPC, based on grade pay, whereas, basic defined as (Basic pay + grade pay). the details of anomalies can be seen from the structure of PB and grade pay and grant-of-benefit. As everything is in your disposal, so you can see and get worked out.
Yours truly
p C pandey, Associate Scientist-0A0, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi Centre, New Delhi-110016
It will make all the stake holders in the Govt to put efforts in its growth.
Board members Very Glad to here the News, Congrat's to Hon'ble PM & FM. Sir Kindly I request the Qualified Group "D" Employees sir 6th CPC recomendations are there are no Group "D" all are Group"C" only should get higher pay/Grade then the low qualified employees, All the cadars peoples are duing the same type of employment but deference is only education thats way given by payband. grade pay deference not required way beacause other Expenditure are Same Please do the needful sir.
Thanking you sir
Board members Very Glad to here the News, Congrat's to Hon'ble PM & FM. Sir Kindly I request the Qualified Group "D" Employees sir 6th CPC recomendations are there are no Group "D" all are Group"C" only should get higher pay/Grade then the low qualified employees, All the cadars peoples are duing the same type of employment but deference is only education thats way given by payband. grade pay deference not required way beacause other Expenditure are Same Please do the needful sir.
Thanking you sir
But in no case the retirement age should be increased, as there are more energetic and qualified unemployment youths are looking to enter into service.
But in case of shortage of any profession like stenographers, may be taken into consideration for extending the age. I there are qualified young professional are available then there is no necessary to increase the retirement age.
In the 6th CPC, only basic was multiplied by 1.86 for all staff but for officer it was 2.63. All low paid and middle cadre may also given consideration for good pay hike. See in the 6the cpc the officers Transport Allowance and the low paid scale are equal. which is in justice.
kannan, trichy
Thanks for constituiting 7th CPC.
Armed forces should be given some extra tax exemption, anomalies of 6th CPC to be cleared first, like DACP for doctors or NFU for other armed forces.
increase the interest rate of DSOP fund.
tpt allowances should increase, stop sahayak facilities and start servant allowance as per the grade pay of the officer.
thanks
thanks,
There should be parity in grade as per educational/Technical qualifiction required for post
O P Singh
It is requested to kindly remove the disparity in grade pay of admn. staff between central govt. employees & autonomous body as we are the sufferer from very long time. Hope you consider the above request & give the happiness to lots of employees of autonomous body.
thanks a lot.
5DAYS WEEK.ONLY DEPARTMENT OF POST WAS WORKING FOR 6DAYS WEEK.IT IS SUGGESTIVE THAT 7TH PAY COMMISSION SHOULD ALSO APPROVE 5DAYS WEEK FOR DEPARTMENT OF POST.
PRAKASH K.
Technical employees in all the capacity in Scientific Research departments may be given chances to compete for each higher and higher post in Scientific category with all the experience they have acquired in all the capacities along with an a direct exam/interview.
Chances may be given to Govt employees to enter in to higher cadre of Civil Services with their own Subjects of specializations and experience in their higher positions clubbed with direct exam/interview with relaxation in age and immaterial of Civil Services Exam.
We the unlucky non teaching staff of the central agricultural university draw your kind attention to the fact that here the pay scale of an eighth passed driver is higher than that of a graduate/ agri Bsc/ BVSc etc.for last 10years authority is playing the same record that the pay anomaly file is with the finance dept, GOI.now where to cry? may we expect justice from the 7th CPC.
Please convey 7th CPC to remove anomalies of field staff which were not recommended by some Departments of pra-military under MHA i.e SSB to 6th CPC as a result these employees suffered a huge losses in their pay.There should also be less gap between employees and officers.
Degree Engineers even if higher qualified M.Tech Engineers are being recruited in Central Government like Indian Railway as Sr.Section Engineers in GP of 4600 and are given the group C status.How far it is justified in a country like India? Are these degree Engineers not being demoralized,degraded and underemployed as compared to the Diploma holder technical assistants in other Government Engineering sectors where they are getting same GP of 4600 & are given group the B status.Please look into the matter seriously & provide justice to such degree Engineers.
I appeal to all the Members to kindly look into the matter and consider for promotional scale in the grade of Stenographer as they are initially recruited in the grade of UDC and retiring in the same post without any further promotion.
Since ages this practice is going on, I think this practice to be arrested by giving larger scope to all the Stenographers working in sub-ordinate offices.
Thanks to the officials for keeping the Stenographers in the Central Secretariat Services though the Stenographers are recruited on par with the stenographers who are working in sub-ordinate offices, but special care was taken in the earlier Pay Commission officials. But no pay justice is done since the stenographer cadre is created.
So, I urge and request all the higher authorities to look into the matter personally and issue favourable orders in the coming 5th CPC on par with the CSS
1. Pay structure of Group 'C' to be review as financial crisis.
2. All Benefits to be implemented in view of prices hike.
3. while giving MACP Promotions, In same view Group 'C' Cat has to give all same Promotions
4. While preparing 7th PC pay structure prepare in a view with considering Group 'C' Employees
venkat
VIZAG
insurance scheme along with serving
employees. The commission may consider giving 20% as addl, pension
on reaching 70 years
kindly hike LDC/UDC'S GRADEPAYS THIS TIME AS THEY ARE GETTING VERY LESS GRADE PAY WHEN COMPARE TO OTHER CADRES. PLEASE TAKE NEEDFUL JUSTICE REGARDING LDC'S/UDC'S MACP SCHEMES.
THANK YOU
LAXMAN, U.D.CLERK
G. C. Behera, NRIADD, Kolkata
sir don't increase the age of 62year, surendra CHENNAI.
The earlier pay commissions has deprived the clerical cadres(LDC/UDC)working in Subordinate offices of Central govt. departments. Please this time make necessary rectifications in their pay through upgradations of grade pay. These days most of LDC/UDC recruited through SSC are graduates/postgraduates. They should be placed in the grade pay of PB-2. The entry grade pay should not be less than 2800/-(Grade Pay). Also financial upgradations should be in the line of promotional hierarchy. The concept of grade pay should be according to promotional post only.
Please give respect to the post of Audit Officers Group B)in the Indian Audit & Accounts Department (IA&AD), by giving grade pay equivalent to present Rs.6600 at least in MACP, then only the Officers in the Audited Institutions who are, generally, Group A Officers will respect them.
Please consider LDC's Qualifications and work when fixation of their scales, please. Please don't ignore them in upcoming pay commission. Pay commission committee members show mercy on LDC'S, PLEASE.
on behalf of all LDC's request
1. We are very happy for the composition of VII CPC and expected that the report should finalize before the Jan 2016.
2. It is stated that the anomaly committee has to give the decision on the pending issues before the VII CPC.
3. No decision has been taken by the anomaly committee since last one year.
Pankaj Lad
CGO
Asst Lib Info Offr
WHEN CONSTITUENT OF 7TH CPC SPECIALLY IN DEFENSE PERSONS OF ALL RANK MUST BE PRESENT TO JUSTIFY& ACCEPT THE PAY SCALE.SAMIR MANDAL
Regarding claiming of medical allowance it is to bring to your notice that Central Government Authorized hospitals are not in every town,if available that too only one or none hospitals are in some towns.
What my request is please allow to take treatment in every big hospital of that town to claim medical allowance instead of that particular recognized hospital, please
Central govt,employees.
2 LEAVE ENCASHMENT BE ADOPTED
3 PERSONAL LOAN FOR MARRIAGE, VEHILCLE AND EDUCATION, OBLIGATORY EXPENSES BE GIVEN BY OFFICE OR WHERE SALARY CREDITED.
4 EVERY EMPLOYEE WHO IS NOT AVAILED HOME TOWN / ALL INDIA LTC WHO WILL BE GRANTED A SUMS AS FIXED BY THEM.
5 AFTER COMPLETION 25 YEARS OF SERVICE V.R.S. SCHEMES BE INTRODUCED AND A ELIGIBLE FAMILY MEMBER BE GIVEN SERVICE AS RAILWAYS ADOPTED.
6 FIX MEDICAL ALLOWANCE BE GRANTED TO HIS WIFE AND CHILDREN ONLY
pay should be fixed with their retrospective date and the arrears should also be settled.
The announcement of the new Pay scale and the basic will otherwise lead to further lesser pay/pension and will pave way permanently to more anomoly.
mukundan
kindly justify in public interest
The reservation business in promotion should be stopped for SC/ST/PH etc in Centrall Govt. Services like Armed Services. Else matching promotional avenue should be created for non-reserved categories of Govt. Officials by reducing the period ACP/MACP schemes at par with residency period of promotion for next higher post due, to deteriorate the reservation policy to protect the Art. 14 & 16 of the constitution of Inda.
They are retiring as Senior Audit Officers without any increase in grade pay or promotion aspects. This injustice should be removed in VII Pay Commission.
Hon'ble Members of Pay Commission should review the anomaly and give justice at least in the VII Pay Commission.
1. Parity with Railway Board Secretariat.
2. Change of designation name Stenographer Gr.I, Grade II etc., to PA or something more attractive.
3. For the past three pay commissions we have got nothing. Therefore, atleast in this 7th pay commission we expect something favourable.
Thank you
2. One eyes on to get LTC once in a year, to go home or all India. Nowadays youngsters are ready to enjoy LTC once in a year.
3. Retirement age should be considered as 58 years instead of 60 years.
4. CHILD CARE LEAVE IS NOT NECESSARY. WOMEN WORKING IN CORPORATE COMPANIES DO HAVE CHILDREN. THERE IS NO SUCH BENEFIT, BUT THEIR CHILDRED COME OUT WITH GOOD PROSPECTS. UNNECESSARY VOTE BANK SHOULD NOT BE CREATED.
on 10 year
EARLIER NOW
8000-13500 PB-II+4600
(a huge difference)
on 20 years
Earlier Now
scale of 10000 PB-II+4800
on 30 years
Earlier Now
scale of 12000 PB-II+5400
Please note these huge differences in the scale earlier granted on promotion hierarchy now on grade pays. Is it our fault for not having promotion even possessing every qualification necessary for promotion just because of cadre structure.It is against natural rule of justice.
plz do something
thanks
25% of last pay drawn on 10 years of service
30% of last pay drawn on 15 years of service
50% of last pay drawn on 20 years of service
on premature retirement due to personal reasons or due to forced
VRS
thanks
Kindly look into the pay issues in respect of Stenographers Cadre as they are the most affected officials in the entire Central Government Departments.
Hoping that 7th CPC Members will resolve and ensure that all the demands will be solved
my wife is working in defence hospital as MNS .recruited as shot service commissioned officer now she is going to finish 5 years of her initial service . if she quit the job is she eligible for job in central civil hospitals in ex service category please someone guide me
mail I'd kathirkums@gmail.com
on 10 year
EARLIER NOW
8000-13500 PB-II+4600
(a huge difference)
on 20 years
Earlier Now
scale of 10000 PB-II+4800
on 30 years
Earlier Now
scale of 12000 PB-II+5400
Please note these huge differences in the scale earlier granted on promotion hierarchy now on grade pays. Is it our fault for not having promotion even possessing every qualification necessary for promotion just because of cadre structure.It is against natural rule of justice after all ACP was introduced for people like us not for the govt. employees getting promotion on regular basis. it was originally meant for the staginate persons as suggested by court of law.
plz do something
thanks
25% of last pay drawn on 10 years of service
30% of last pay drawn on 15 years of service
50% of last pay drawn on 20 years of service
on premature retirement due to personal reasons or due to forced
VRS seeing the uncertainty in life.
thanks
thanks
thanks
Sunil Kumar
Medical facility given to EMPLOYEE's PARENTS
The kendriya vidyalaya lab attendants/university laboratory attendants staff 6th pay commission recommendation is 5200+1800(grade pay).The above pay scale is poor when compare to technical staff. The qualification is 10th standard but salary is very low (compare to unskilled /illiterate)Therefore please make correction/change in 7th pay commission recommendation.Thank You
kindly do some thing for armed forces personnel, they should be enrolled in state govt. or central govt. after attaining the age of 40 or 45 years because after this age personnel are not so capable to perform the duties required by the armed forces. They should be given direct enrolment in civil services as per their qualification, definitely they will perform better instead of getting bored in the same routine.
thanks
thanks
thanks
25% of last pay drawn on 10 years of service
30% of last pay drawn on 15 years of service
50% of last pay drawn on 20 years of service
on premature retirement due to personal reasons or due to forced
VRS seeing the uncertainty in life.
thanks
on 10 year
EARLIER NOW
8000-13500 PB-II+4600
(a huge difference)
on 20 years
Earlier Now
scale of 10000 PB-II+4800
on 30 years
Earlier Now
scale of 12000 PB-II+5400
Please note these huge differences in the scale earlier granted on promotion hierarchy now on grade pays. Is it our fault for not having promotion even possessing every qualification necessary for promotion just because of cadre structure.It is against natural rule of justice after all ACP was introduced for people like us not for the govt. employees getting promotion on regular basis. it was originally meant for the staginate persons as suggested by court of law.
plz do something
thanks
2. One eyes on to get LTC once in a year, to go home or all India.
3.CCL is not at all employee.
4.Every Eight years ACP of all Employee.
5.Retirement age should be considered as 58 years instead of 60 years.
Mohan Lal Saini
Please review the pay scale in postal department. since we are doing banking,insurance,all other multi tasks. so we want separate pay structure. The officials in operative side are working 6 days fully. But in all administrative side they are working 5 days. This should be reviewed. CCL also to reviewed
D.V.RAMANA, OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT, J.N.V, NUAPADA(ODISHA)
atleast 5 promotion for every qualified staff in his entire service period.
10000/- GP to scientists with 17 years of class one service is solicited through this pay commission.
MACP should be modified on promotional post basis or cadre hierarchy basis not on grade pay hierarchy basis as it in present form defeats its purpose granting promotional scale to staff where promotion does not exist.
same post should have the same qualification and same scale.
atleat 5 macps for all govt staff.
LTC should not be restricted to only two childrens.
child care leave for male employees
A junior stenographer in CSS Service have chances to reach upto PSO (8700 grade pay) in PB 4 cadre whereas a stenographer joins in non CSS organization are retiring as PS only in the GP of Rs.4600/- in PB-2, which is totally an injustice to the non-CSS service. The Hon'ble Chairman may look into it and guide suitable ways for the betterment of the non-CSS stenography cadre more particularly posted in subordinates office. As per the latest guidelines, a Joint Secretary is entitled to have a PPS post in the GP of Rs.6,600/-. The officers posted in the subordinate offices is of JS cadre. As such, the post of PPS may be provided in subordinate office to alleviate the disparity.
BPR Vithal
PS
UIDAI
FCS is demeaning and not fast track promotion as tauted by the administrators. Like doctors were given 10000 GP by the sixth pay commission. Seventh pay commission should allow scientist with 17 years class one service experience equivalent scale to 10000 GP.
Because have seen,4th,5th, and 6th pay commissions and i am going to see the 7th also, till now i have not seen total implementation of recommendations,still so many queries are to be clarified by the govt. Who is going to see that.
Sir/Madam,
Parity of Grade Pay of Rs.5400 between the Group 'B' Officers of Postal Department, Income Tax, Central Excise and Customs Department who are drawing Grade pay of Rs.4800, are allowed to draw Grade Pay of Rs.5400 after putting 4 years of service whereas such offer was not allowed to the Group 'B' officers working in other departments of Central Government, even though they had drawn equivalent pay prior to VI Pay Commission.
The parity of Grade pay between the Group B Officers in the Revenue Department and other Sub-ordinate Offices may be reconciled to avoid conflicting of interest.
Please provide some incentives for acquiring higher qualification to the Technicians. As it is very difficult to take a degree with First Class while working. Though a degree is obtained, proper recognition is not given.It is requested to provide some incentives for the achievement.
Casual Leave Eight ki jagah Twelve honi chahiye.
LTC bhi Home Town ki tarah pratyek versh milni chahiye.
Earned Leave ki jagah Medical Leave ko nahi jodna chahyie. Medical Leave ka alag se Aarthik Labh diya jana Chahiye.
2. Child care leave not for male & female employees.
3. Maximum transport allowance for NCR Employee.
4. LTC once in a year, to go home or all India.
5. Minimum EL 360.
6. Benefit Cross 500 Medical Leave.
Please that,as a central govt employee, we should get proportionate pensions for the service provided by us to govt. just like
30% of last pay drawn on 10 years of service
40% of last pay drawn on 15 years of service
50% of last pay drawn on 20 years of service
on premature retirement due to personal reasons or due to forced
VRS seeing the uncertainty in life or due to dismissal from service
thanks
MACP should be modified on promotional post basis or cadre hierarchy basis not on grade pay hierarchy basis as it in present form defeats its purpose granting promotional scale to staff where promotion does not exist.
same post should have the same qualification and same scale.
atleat 5 macps for all govt staff.
LTC should not be restricted to only two childrens.
child care leave for male employees
I am also working as a Senior Technical Assistant in the scale of PB-II+4200 from the date of appointment in delhi university which adopted 6 CPC at par with the central government employees. I also falls in the category of employees where there is no room for promotion even after 30 years of service in the same scale. The employees like me the government earlier introduced ACP/MACP scheme. According to that
on 10 year
EARLIER NOW
8000-13500 PB-II+4600
(a huge difference)
on 20 years
Earlier Now
scale of 10000 PB-II+4800
on 30 years
Earlier Now
scale of 12000 PB-II+5400
Please note these huge differences in the scale earlier granted on promotion hierarchy now on grade pays. Is it our fault for not having promotion even possessing every qualification necessary for promotion just because of cadre structure.It is against natural rule of justice after all ACP was introduced for people like us not for the govt. employees getting promotion on regular basis. it was originally meant for the staginate persons as suggested by court of law.
plz do something
I am totally agree with you as a central govt employees we should demand for proportionate pensions for us. just like
25% of last pay drawn on 10 years of service
30% of last pay drawn on 15 years of service
50% of last pay drawn on 20 years of service
on premature retirement due to personal reasons or due to forced
VRS seeing the uncertainty in life.
I would like to point out the issue not settled since from adoption of 6 CPC to till date, it was ACP v/s MACP whereas ACP was on promotional hierarchy on contarorary MACP is on grad pay hierarchy which causes greater disparity between the employees of the same cadre earlier got the ACP whereas later was governed by the MACP. moreover the tenure of MACP 10 years is too long it should be 5 year or 7 years. I would also like to point out that there are small difference in the grade pay such as PB-1+1800 & PB-1+1900 similarly PB-II+4600 and PB-II 4800 see the difference 100 rupees or 200 rupees after 10 years of service this is nothing but shame of 6CPC these should be merged together.
same pay structure for the same post such as Sr. Technical Assistant were put on different pay slabs e.g. PB-II+4200, PB-II+4600 etc. Thus causing unnecessary demarcation of post.
I am totally agree with the STA in scale of 9300+4200, earlier according to ACP/time bound Scheme our colleagues got PBIII+5400 after 12 years /8 years as the case may be. But now we will not get the same even after 20 years or we will get it into 30 years of service a huge anomaly, plz rectify it. as we are in the same scale and having similar qualification and spend the similar time period as well as holding the same post. plz do something for us.
thanks
Please see that Degree engineers are recruited by Indian Railway the largest CG organisation of India as Sr.Section Engineers(SSE) in the GP of 4600/- and are given group-C status where as the same degree engineers recruited by other central & even if state governments and are provided group-A status.There is also no time bound promotion throughout service & even if one has to retire as same SSE.Please try to provide justice to these degree engineers & solve the discrepancies.
2. Minimum 4 MACP for all govt staff.
3. Minimum EL 360.
REGD CCL GIVE UPTO 10 YEARS,BEYOND THAT TO ONLY MOTHER'S -CHILDREN SUFFERING FROM JUVENILE DIABETES,EPILEPSY,MENTALLY RETARD ,MONGOLIAN,THALASEMIAS & OTHER CHRONIC AILMENTS
U CAN CONSULTS PAEDTRICIANS & OTHER DR'S
2. All pending items discussed in the National Anomaly Committee should be settled.
3. Increment for those who rtd on 30th June may be resolved.
4. 7th CPC may consider to recommend a nominal amount as transport allowance to pensioners and also nominal amount as HRA to pensioners.
2. Increment for those who rtd on 30th June.
3. All pending items in the National Anomaly Committee (6th CPC) should be resolved.
4. Nominal amount of Transport allowance to pensioners per month may be fixed.
4. nominal percentage of HRA for the retired personnel
This is for your kind attention that ,It is possible only in Indian Railway that the directly recruited degree engineers working as Sr.Section Engineers are given Group-C status where as the diploma engineers of other central government organisations have already been given Group-B status.So the degree engineers of Railway should be given at least the same or better social status to encourage them to discharge there duties successfully.Again it is also very shame to say the we the degree engineers are getting GP of 4600/- which is less than the D Pharm holder medical Matron's GP of 5400/- posted in same Railway organisation.Also as per MACP rule after 10 years of service we will be moved to the next GP of 4800/- i.e only a Rs.200 difference after providing 10 years of essential service to the nation.From these facts you please try to understand, how the Degree Engineers are neglected in Indian Railway continuously and as a result how will they discharge their duties satisfactorily ?
In Pakistan HRA to spouse is payable even if he/she reside at Govt accommodation.
Order to this affect issued on 18.04.2013.
I think order in this regard need to be reviewed in India also
2. Please review stagnation relief scheme like Time Scale, Dynamic ACP, MACP, Flexible Complimentary Scheme and NFU and introduce uniformity: At least personal financial upgradations after 3,7, 12, 17, 22, 27 and 32 years of service, since the same is hardly equal to 6% in basic.
3. Make allowance practical; E.g. Transport allowance, conveyance allowance , hotel allowance etc are 25% of equal expenditure.
4. HRA should be linked to the market value of Govt Accommodation to introduce parity between various central employees.
5. Employees may be given higher annual performance increment based on last years' performance, so that there is enough financial motivation to perform.
6. Do away with the system of Employee classification. Let there be staff and officers only. Staff at three levels may be allowed to enter officers grade with exam and training.
I am inviting your kind attention on the below mentioned subject for your kind needful action please .
Sir, according to the 5th CPC, there is a basic fitment given to all scales then after gave an increment in three years gap. So employees enlisted/ re - mustered within three years were put into same basic pay and they were till in 2012 even after implementation of 6th CPC because the 6th CPC did not give any basic fitment and multiply their old basic pay X 1.86. wef 1.1.2006.
But, during 2012 an increment in pre-revised pay scale has been given to those whose increment in between February to june in the year 2008. Which made un solvable anomaly between junior and senior which are simply explained in below table according to 5th CPC.
year A B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1994 January February March April May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov Dec.
C D
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1995 January February March April May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov Dec.
E F
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1996 January February March April May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov Dec.
In above table A to F had been getting equal pay after implementation of 5th CPC to till 2012. But during 2012 one increment in pre revised pay scale has given to A,C,E only as a partial manner and B,D,F were rejected.
“B” is three years senior than “E” But “ B” was rejected …… like as “7” is just one month junior from “6” so “7” also have equal right to get equal pay as “6” in one month later But ”7” was permanently rejected where as “30” is getting increment permanently . such B,D,F also have equal right to get equal pay in respect months But never ,because the order what ever , refer only the basic pay of 2008 but that never consider the implementation of 5th CPC.
There is high degree respect maintained between senior and junior in armed forces , at the same time a three year senior could not tell his pay before his junior on his eradicating which giving moral down to the seniors .
Secondly , The 6th CPC give basic fitment ( entry pay ) to direct appointment cadres only but the local promote satisfied with one increment @ 3% resulting the direct appointed candidate getting more pay than the local promote . It is also a unjustified able one because a cadre spent 20 years in border getting less pay than a directed appointed co - worker in same rank at same time
. So we request the Chair man 7th CPC to take needful to remove the such type of anomaly in 7th CPC.
According to the 5th CPC, there is a basic fitment given to all scales then after gave an increment in three years gap. So employees enlisted/ re - mustered within three years were put into same basic pay and they were till in 2012 even after implementation of 6th CPC because the 6th CPC did not give any basic fitment and multiply their old basic pay X 1.86. wef 1.1.2006.
But, during 2012 an increment in pre-revised pay scale has been given to those whose increment in between February to june in the year 2008. Which made un solvable anomaly between junior and senior Because once whose a/i 6/97 has got permanent increment but his 3 years senior whose a/I - 7/1994 permanently rejected.
Secondly , The 6th CPC give basic fitment ( entry pay ) to direct appointment cadres only but the local promote satisfied with one increment @ 3% resulting the direct appointed candidate getting more pay than the local promote . It is also a unjustified able one because a cadre spent 20 years in border getting less pay than a directed appointed co - worker in same rank in same time .
. So we request the Chair man 7th CPC to take needful to remove the such type of anomaly so that a three years senior cadre can get equal pay at par at his three years junior at least from 7th CPC .
We shall ever thankful for your act of kindness..//
but every time group B and C EMPLOYEE DID NOT GET HIGHER PAY SCALE ONLY BENIFIT GIVEN GROUP a EMPLOYEE MEANS AMIR OR AMIR HO JAYEGA
Neutral Judges/Bureaucrats who decides the fate of other human beings, the fate of the country should think twice before fixing the scale of pay/grade pay of the poor employees as they are also have family, kids like them.
Kindly look the position of Stenographers working in the field offices in India. They are deprived of from benefits /pay structure in comparison to Stenographers at Central Secretariat. Besides this, the MACP scheme totally thrown away the Stenographers in field offices, because of which there are Grade pay Differences between two stenographers after 20 years of equal service with equal responsibilities.
Steno: A
Basic Pay as on 1.1.06 per 5th CPC: Rs.5800/-( in the scale of 5500-8000)
Grade Pay after 6th CPC : Rs.4200/-
Grade Pay after 20 Yrs. of Service: Rs.4600/-
Steno: B:
Basic Pay as on 1.1.06 as per 5th CPC: Rs.5400/-( in the scale of 4000-6000)
Grade Pay after 6th CPC: Rs.2400/-
Grade pay after 10 yrs. Service:Rs.2800/-
Grade pay after 20 yrs. service :Rs.4200/-
this shows that two Stenographers with same designation and responsibilities will get different grade pay after 20 years of service.
Therefore, it is requested that the 7th CPC may consider to allow Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- to those stenographer who were in the scale of Rs.4000-6000/- and basic pay arrived at Rs.5000/- and above as on 1.1.2006 to remove the anomaly.
One of the LTC of 4 years block should be any where in world specially after completion of 15 year of continuous Govt. service.
Library and Information Assistants' grade pay is 4200 in 6th pay commission. It should be 4600 grade pay as min qualification is graduate plus professional qualification. Kindly rectify this in 7th pay commission.
Thanks
The annual increment fixed by sixth CPC is July is not acceptable, because an employee worked up to June he/she will not get his/ her increment. Hope this will be rectify by the seventh CPC.So please consider an employee worked minimum six month he/she awarded increment at time of superannuation.
7TH PAY COMMISSION MUST CONSIDER TO WITHDRAW THE NEW PENSION SCHEME,AS IT IS INJUSTICE TO EMPLOYEES JOINED AFTER 1.1.2004.EMPLOYEES DOING EXACTLY SAME WORK CAN NOT BE DIFFERENTIATED IN THEIR RETIREMENT BENIFITS,JUST ON THE BASIS OF THEIR JOINING DATE.
Chandran Peechulli chandranpeechulli@gmail.com 12:59 (5 hours ago)
to oicesmchennai, Def.Secy.(RK), bcc: Ashutosh(ADC to GOC ATNK&K), cgda, lci-dla, harjit.singh59
Dear Lt.Col Arun Krishnan Kutty,
Please go through, the text e-mailed to you and as well as the clean print copy, passed on to you on the 25th March 2014, for needful action as assured by you.
Sirs, the dismissal of OA7/2013 and RA16/2013, by the Chennai Regional Bench is null and void, if seen fairly in an unbiased view/perception. Since, the very same bench considered the delay and lapses in many other cases but for discriminatory in my case, which is a violation of fundamental right of a citizen, as enshrined in the Indian Constitution, besides delay was not entirely on the part of the aggrieved ex-serviceman, since my calling on the DSS&A Board went all of vain and letters addressed to the SIGNALS RECORDS went un-answered with no reply, alas came the formation of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, came into practice in 2009 and my application(petition), filed in 2012 and after persistent reminders, same numbered O.A7/2013, followed byR.A.16/2013, same un-fairly dismissed. However, revealed that I have been deprived of my entitlement (Disability Pension) for the fault of WRONG Service Code 13.3.4 instead of 13.3.3. *While 13.3.4 is discharge on own request. This has misled, for the PCDA to reject the disability pension, of P.K.Chandran's legitimate claim.
Thanks.
Address:Ex.6286018. Rect.(Ex.Boy O.C.) P.K.Chandran, M107-5 "Prefabs" No.29th Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600090.
Our Association's Genl.Secy. and Smt.Aditi Pramanik,Jt.Genl.Secretary,OCM member being the SOLE WOMAN CANDIDATE for the purpose of WOMEN RESERVATION as sanctioned by the INDIAN PARLIAMENT are available now on at NEW DELHI for submission of the REPRESENTATIONS and for threadbare discussions at that end.[22-04-2014,Tuesday