Employees whose DNI falls between 1st February to 1st June(Pre Revised Scale)...
Anomaly in annual increment arising due to the implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission Recommendations
The point regarding the anomaly relating to Rule 9 of the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, concerning the date of next increment has been discussed in second Anomaly Committee meeting held on 27th March 2010. According to the Minutes of the meeting, Published by DOP&T on 4th May 2010, the Staff Side reiterated their demand that employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June may be given an increment, as a onetime measure, in the pre revised pay scales on 1.1.2006 as has already been done in respect of employees whose next date of increment was 1.1.2006.
The representatives of the Department of Expenditure stated that it is important to first examine the repercussions of granting an increment w.e.f 1. 1. 2006 in the pre revised pay scale because such a decision may eventually lead to certain other anomalies. After a long discussion, it was agreed that the Official Side would re- examine the matter and either suitable clarification in this regard will be issued before the next meeting of the National Anomaly Committee or if there is a need, the Department of Expenditure shall discuss the matter again with the representatives of the Staff Side.
But ,as agreed by the official side,the suitable clarification not been issued till now .
One of our viewer Ms.Pushpa Malhotra,writes her views regarding Pay anomaly in annual increment arising due to the implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission Recommendations .
Dear Sir,
I like to invite government’s kind attention to the minutes of the second meeting of National Anomoly Committee held on 27th March,2010 and like to convey my sincere gratitude as an individual for the concern shown by Govt. representatives and representatives of Staff side in resolving the anomalies out of 6th CPC.
While discussing the Agenda No.5 (v), the representatives of the Govt. had expressed apprehension that granting an increment w.e.f. 01.01.2006 in pre-revised pay- scale to those employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June, as a one time measure may eventually lead to certain anomalies and therefore proposal had to be examined first. In this connection, I would like to submit that by all probabilities, it may not create anomaly because the seniors got this benefit by taking the increment on or before 01.01.2006. However more realistic approach could be to revise the pay on the date of increment / promotion between 01.02.2006 to 01.06.2006 and allow the next increment on 01.07.2006. In this case the employees may forego the arrears for the period from 01.01.2006 till revision of pay as they will draw pre-revised pay till then.
I hope the official side will come out with an appropriate solution to solve the anomaly. Needful to mention that my increment date was 01.02.2006 and retirement date falls on 31st March. The increment drawn for the period from 01.02.2006 to 30.06.2006, 01.02.2007 to 30.06.2007 and 01.02.2008 to 30.06.2008 in the pre-revised grade have been withdrawn and my arrears were very less than my juniors due to postponement of increment dates. Besides, it will effect my pensionary benefits because my retirement date falls on 31st March, whereas before 6th CPC, the increment date was 1st February i.e. before my retirement and my pension would have fixed after drawal of increment.
I hope, the Govt. will consider the issue sympathatically and issue necessary orders to settle the anomaly so that we are not put to regular financial loss, including pensionary benefits.
The point regarding the anomaly relating to Rule 9 of the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, concerning the date of next increment has been discussed in second Anomaly Committee meeting held on 27th March 2010. According to the Minutes of the meeting, Published by DOP&T on 4th May 2010, the Staff Side reiterated their demand that employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June may be given an increment, as a onetime measure, in the pre revised pay scales on 1.1.2006 as has already been done in respect of employees whose next date of increment was 1.1.2006.
The representatives of the Department of Expenditure stated that it is important to first examine the repercussions of granting an increment w.e.f 1. 1. 2006 in the pre revised pay scale because such a decision may eventually lead to certain other anomalies. After a long discussion, it was agreed that the Official Side would re- examine the matter and either suitable clarification in this regard will be issued before the next meeting of the National Anomaly Committee or if there is a need, the Department of Expenditure shall discuss the matter again with the representatives of the Staff Side.
But ,as agreed by the official side,the suitable clarification not been issued till now .
One of our viewer Ms.Pushpa Malhotra,writes her views regarding Pay anomaly in annual increment arising due to the implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission Recommendations .
Dear Sir,
I like to invite government’s kind attention to the minutes of the second meeting of National Anomoly Committee held on 27th March,2010 and like to convey my sincere gratitude as an individual for the concern shown by Govt. representatives and representatives of Staff side in resolving the anomalies out of 6th CPC.
While discussing the Agenda No.5 (v), the representatives of the Govt. had expressed apprehension that granting an increment w.e.f. 01.01.2006 in pre-revised pay- scale to those employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June, as a one time measure may eventually lead to certain anomalies and therefore proposal had to be examined first. In this connection, I would like to submit that by all probabilities, it may not create anomaly because the seniors got this benefit by taking the increment on or before 01.01.2006. However more realistic approach could be to revise the pay on the date of increment / promotion between 01.02.2006 to 01.06.2006 and allow the next increment on 01.07.2006. In this case the employees may forego the arrears for the period from 01.01.2006 till revision of pay as they will draw pre-revised pay till then.
I hope the official side will come out with an appropriate solution to solve the anomaly. Needful to mention that my increment date was 01.02.2006 and retirement date falls on 31st March. The increment drawn for the period from 01.02.2006 to 30.06.2006, 01.02.2007 to 30.06.2007 and 01.02.2008 to 30.06.2008 in the pre-revised grade have been withdrawn and my arrears were very less than my juniors due to postponement of increment dates. Besides, it will effect my pensionary benefits because my retirement date falls on 31st March, whereas before 6th CPC, the increment date was 1st February i.e. before my retirement and my pension would have fixed after drawal of increment.
I hope, the Govt. will consider the issue sympathatically and issue necessary orders to settle the anomaly so that we are not put to regular financial loss, including pensionary benefits.
(Pushpa Malhotra)
Assistant,
National Council for Cooperative Training,
Under M/o Agriculture, (Deptt. of Agril. & Coopn.)
Assistant,
National Council for Cooperative Training,
Under M/o Agriculture, (Deptt. of Agril. & Coopn.)
Source: GServants
Comments
Hope the staff side will raise this issue too and Anomaly committee will accept it.
Thanking you
Dear Sir,
I like to invite government’s kind attention to the minutes of the second meeting of National Anomoly Committee held on 27th March,2010 and like to convey my sincere gratitude as an individual for the concern shown by Govt. representatives and representatives of Staff side in resolving the anomalies out of 6th CPC.
While discussing the Agenda No.5 (v), the representatives of the Govt. had expressed apprehension that granting an increment w.e.f. 01.01.2006 in pre-revised pay- scale to those employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June, as a one time measure may eventually lead to certain anomalies and therefore proposal had to be examined first. In this connection, I would like to submit that by all probabilities, it may not create anomaly because the seniors got this benefit by taking the increment on or before 01.01.2006. However more realistic approach could be to revise the pay on the date of increment / promotion between 01.02.2006 to 01.06.2006 and allow the next increment on 01.07.2006. In this case the employees may forego the arrears for the period from 01.01.2006 till revision of pay as they will draw pre-revised pay till then.
I hope the official side will come out with an appropriate solution to solve the anomaly. Needful to mention that my increment date was 0n1.05.06.The increment drawn for the period from 01.05.2006 to 30.06.2006, 01.05.2007 to 30.06.2007 and 01.05.2008 to 30.06.2008 in the pre-revised grade have been withdrawn and my arrears were very less than my juniors due to postponement of increment .
I hope, the Govt. will consider the issue sympathatically and issue necessary orders to settle the anomaly so that we are not put to regular financial loss, including pensionary benefi
(AJAY SURI)
Pharmacist
Extra Divisional Railway Hospital
Northern Railway
Jagadhri Workshop
District Yamuna nagar
MOB 9896032085,9729537299
The prominent thing which comes to mind in MACP is its date effect It is from date of issue of order.The effective date is causing many disparities in amount of pension of those who ceased to be in service between 01/01/2006 to 09/09/2008. and after 09/09/2008. Perhaps u also know this fact. It will be better if Govt. makes effective from 01/01/2006 for the purpose of fixation of notional pay and gives benefit in pension
S D KAHALEY
NAGPUR
18/10/2010
It is the case with me also ie, my date of next increament was 1-3-2006 and retirement date is also April.
Due to this, either I got an increament in March 2006 nor will going to get before retirement.
This anomoly need to be rectified either by allowing advance increament as on 1-1-2006 or on 1-3-2006 as a one time measure. Out of two any date is OK.
Please find a solution to the officers whose DNI lies between 1-1-2006 to 30-6-2006 at the earliest
s. shekhar
from shyamal sarkar
assistant field officer(telecom)
sashastra seema bal
The anomaly regarding stepping up of pay according to Item No.19 reflected in the statement indicating the gist of decisions taken during the Second Meeting of the Joint Committee on MACPS held on 15/09/10 circulated under DOPT OM No.11/1/2010-JCA dt 06 Oct 10, arised due to withdrawal of increment from employees whose increment dates falls between 01 Feb 2006 to 30 Jun 2006 in the pre-revised scale of pay. However, if the Govt. would grant one increment as on 01/01/2006 in the pre-revised scale of pay, to employees who were due for Annual Increment between 01/02/06 to 30/06/06 as in the case of persons whose increment date was on 01 Jan 2006 as one time measure, many cases pertaining to stepping up can be resolved.
The minimum pay for employees appointed in Govt. Service after 01/01/2006 has been specified in the CCS (RP) Rules 2008 according to Grade Pay. Whether, the same is applicable to promotees (who have promoted after 01/01/06 and drawing pay less than the minimum prescribed with GP) also under FR-22(I)(a)(1).
Further, I would like to ask the Govt.Authorities that despite, accepted by the 6th CPC to merge the pre-revise Pay Scales of Rs.5000-8000/- and Rs.5500-9000/- into Rs.6500-10500/- Wef.01/01/2006, why the pay of the affected employees have been fixed less than the minimum of Rs.12090/- (ie. Rs.6500 x 1.86) by depriving the existing fundamental rules and constitutional rights of officials. Apart from the above, Govt. is not maintaining parity in pay of employees between Secretariate & Non-Secretariate departments, as per the decision of the 6th CPC. Whether, the Govt. of India has gone so injustice to its employees. As a result of this iniquity of Govt., employees like me, who have rendered 30 years long service, are facing the loss of huge amount (ie. Rs.4000/- to Rs.5000/-) every month in our salaries and it will effect in pension also.
In view of the above, I solicit to the Authorities of Govt. & National Anomaly Committee to take appropriate action
to settle the long pending pay anomalies of 6th CPC soon to get relief to serving as well as retiring officials of the
Govt. of India.
Thanks, Jai Hind. SOMI
and date of birth in june. thus i am suffered twise . first i not get increment for 17 months and second i can't get increment for just 1 day
shorter for next increment.
for ex. those who increament is in month of feb mean he already work 11month so he should be given increament =yearincreament*11/12. that is if he in grade of 5500-9000 is increament is=175*11/12= Rs.160/- should be added to his basic as on 1/1/2006 then should be fix in 6th pay commission.
sanjay sangvikar pune
1. whose DNI falls between 01.08.2005 and 01.01.2006 gets next increments in a span of 06 to 11 months.
2. whose DNI falls between 01.02.2006 and 01.06.2006 gets next increment in a span of 13 to 17 months.
I hope this solution will be acceptable to the members of the anomaly committee as well as the affected partis, who otherwise would be losers for entire life 9including on retirement)
for this I am requesting to employees union to make pressure on anomaly committee. and a request to anomaly committee to look this genuine problem and take apropriate dicision as soon as posible.
KAK
pk gupta
I am working as pgt in NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI
My date of joining is 29/10/2003. As on 1/1/2006 my pay fixed at Rs 12840+grade pay 4800.DNI on 1/7/2007.
But newly recruited pgt as on 1/1/2006 draw rs 13350+grade pay 4800 which is more than mine.
If ,I will go for anamoly with him who joined on 7/1/2006 ,I lose increment on 1/7/2006.Here I am drawing less than my junior and if I gofor pay fixed of 12840 I will be Rs 20 only more to my junior as on 1/7/2007. So, we requesting to consider our case and requesting to give an additional increment on 1/7/2006 by giving entry scale of rs 13350 as on 1/1/2006 without considering anamoly.
sm2903@live.com
Due to fixing the date of annual increment on every 1st July, the individuals whose increment falls between 1st Feb. to 1st June and if their superannuation is also due between their increment month to 30th June, are looser of one annual increment.
I am one of the sufferer. My annual increment was due on 1st March 2006. My superannuation was also due on 30th June 2009. Due to fixing the date of annual increment only on every 1st July, my annual increment was shifted after 4 months on 1st July 2006 and I have been given only 3 increments on 1st July 2006, 2007 & 2008 and superannuated on 30th June 2009 even after rendering 12 months regular service (which entitles an annual increment).Otherwise I would have been superannuated on 30th June 2009 after granting 4 annual increments on 1st March 2006, 2007, 2008 & 2009. Thus my total 4+12=16 months service gone in vain. My humble request is to compensate this loss of an annual increment which has also affected my pension airy benefits.
B.N.Kanaujia'
196/X-1, Krishnapuram,
Kanpur 208 007
I would like to inform you that in the sixth pay commission disparity in the pay-Band 4 to upto pay band 3. sixth pay commission enhance the salary pay band 4 upto 2.8 times and 1.8 times upto pay band 3.
Again the disparity in the increment whose date of increment is between February to june this is a great loss to the employees. whose numbers are more in the government of India Job.. Please take into consideration as early as possible.
Hon'ble Sirs,
Kindly take the anomaly issue for those whose DNI falls between Feb and June 2006 and settle the same. The following aspects are not justified by the VI CPC & Anomalies Committee till date:-
(a) That the juniors is getting more pay than the senior in the same grade due to postponing of DNI of officials whose falls between Feb and June 2006 to Jul 2006.
(b) About 40-50% officials whose AI in Dec 2006 got advanced to July 2006 but the officials like me whose AI in Feb 2006 cannot get in Jan 2006 but postponed to July 2006.
(c) About 25-30% officials whose AI in Jan 2006 got double benefit i.e one AI at old rate on 01 Jan 2006 and after six months in Jul 2006 one AI at new rate due to said great error done by both VI CPC & Anomalies Committee. But aggrieved officials are deprived from both their normal AI on due dates or advancement to Jan 2006.
Therefore, kindly raise and settle this issue in interest of natural justice please.
Hon'ble Sirs,
Kindly take the anomaly issue for those whose DNI falls between Feb and June 2006 and settle the same. The following aspects are not justified by the VI CPC & Anomalies Committee till date:-
(a) That the juniors is getting more pay than the senior in the same grade due to postponing of DNI of officials whose falls between Feb and June 2006 to Jul 2006.
(b) About 40-50% officials whose AI in Dec 2006 got advanced to July 2006 but the officials like me whose AI in Mar 2006 cannot get in Jan 2006 but postponed to July 2006.
(c) About 25-30% officials whose AI in Jan 2006 got double benefit i.e one AI at old rate on 01 Jan 2006 and after six months in Jul 2006 one AI at new rate due to said great error done by both VI CPC & Anomalies Committee. But aggrieved officials are deprived from both their normal AI on due dates or advancement to Jan 2006.
Therefore, kindly raise and settle this issue in interest of natural justice please.
As of now, the issue of AI for those employees whose DNI falls between Feb and Jun 2006 is being raised from every corner of Govt. Deptt. Sir,it was very well clear to the policy makers that AI means Annual Increment i.e. 12 months and not 17,18 months and so on but they have forcibly launched a wrong policy on AI (the matter of 6 months is also covered) in the VIth CPC without any penalty awarded to we people. Should we, THE SUFFERERS hope for a justice with a humble request or be prepared to form another platform just to fight for our legal RIGHT.
Thanks
G D Joshi
WCR Jabalpur
I want to draw your kind attention towards the long pending demand of the employees for the increment month. I can’t not understand why these leaders are not able to solve this simple problem. Is this the fault of an employee that he or she born between Feb to June .Is this the fault of the employee that he got the joining letter between Feb to June. Actually this problem is only created by the pay commission. Is this a right thing that a person joins in July getting more than to a person who join in June .why these leader are calculation the patients of the aggrieved people. Still this problem can be solved by setting two increments one in Jan and second in July.
Hon'ble Sirs,
Kindly take the anomaly issue for those whose DNI falls between Feb and June 2006 and settle the same. The following aspects are not justified by the VI CPC & Anomalies Committee till date:-
(a) That the juniors is getting more pay than the senior in the same grade due to postponing of DNI of officials whose falls between Feb and June 2006 to Jul 2006.
(b) About 40-50% officials whose AI in Dec 2006 got advanced to July 2006 but the officials like me whose AI in Mar 2006 cannot get in Jan 2006 but postponed to July 2006.
(c) About 25-30% officials whose AI in Jan 2006 got double benefit i.e one AI at old rate on 01 Jan 2006 and after six months in Jul 2006 one AI at new rate due to said great error done by both VI CPC & Anomalies Committee. But aggrieved officials are deprived from both their normal AI on due dates or advancement to Jan 2006.
Therefore, kindly raise and settle this issue in interest of natural justice please
Thanks
Now the person who joins in February and December get same salary. It is not just. So kindly solve this problem by giving one increment to the aggrieved employees who joined between Feb to June. At the time of retirement also the employee who joined between Feb to june are not getting one increment so it affects pensionary benefits.
So please consider this problem and solve this problem favourably.
Hope the staff side will raise this issue too and Anomaly committee will accept it.
(1) Granting one increment as on 1-1-06 in the pre-revised scale will not solve the problem, particularly for new recruits who joined between Feb 2006 and June 2006, and persons who got selection grade on promotion from PB-3 to PB-4 between February to June 2006. Apart from financial loss, this places a person at same level as one who has joined/ promoted on 1-1-07.Hence, the only solution in such cases is allowing grant of increment on 1-7-06 itself (and not after one year, i.e. 1-7-07). However, as this may open pandora's box, instead of allowing full 3% increment, pro-rata increment @ 0.5% increment per month (as persons with six months service get full 3% increment) should be calculated as on 01-01-06, and should be granted to such persons. The fact that ithe increment is annual does not prohibit granting of increment on 01-07-06. It is an annual increment, because the next increment would come after one full year, i.e. on 01-07-07. A lower increment for less than six months service will bring fairplay vis-a-vis seniors as well. This method will particularly be suitable for new recruits after 01-01-06.
(2) The other alternative is that all persons who were promoted between February to July 2006, should be allowed normal increment on 01-07-06, as a one time measure.
(3) The case of the persons who retired between before 01-07-06, and had increment dates fell between February to June 2006 does not get resolved by the above two methods. As a one time measure, such persons may be allowed one increment on 01-01-2006 as one time measure.
Considering this,the decision taken in the National Anomaly Committee must be carefully examined. It should be implemented at the earliest. Theoretically, more than 40% of the total Central Govt employees, whose increment dates fell between February and June under the 5th Pay Commission will be benefited from this.
---------------------------------
To grant one additional increment to whose date falls between Feb to June is good.But I want to state that the concept of proportionate increment is to considered along with this issue because who retires in May will have to lost near about one increment. Therefore those who retires between July-31 to May-31 should allowed proportionate increment for each month for the service they have renders.