National Anomaly Committee Meeting Conclusions and Discussions
Staff Side Leader Mr. M.Raghavaiah has written in his website regarding the second anomaly committee meeting conclusions on important issues and discussions briefly to the General Secretaries of affiliated unions of National Federation of Indian Railwaymen.
The full text of conclusions as reported by the National Anomaly committee Leader in his website is reproduced below...
The General Secretaries of
affiliated Unions of NFIR.
Sub:- National Anomaly Committee Meeting held at North Block, New Delhi on 27.3.2010
Conclusions on important issues pertaining to Anomalies as a result of discussions in to-day’s meeting are mentioned below:-
1.Anomaly due to postponement of increment in the case of those whose increment has fallen from February to June, 2006:-:
After discussions, it was agreed to issue orders for rectifying the anomaly. We have suggested that in all those cases the annual increment may be pre-dated to 1.1.2006. We are hopeful that order as demanded will be issued.
2. Various aberrations in the Modified Assured Career Progressive Scheme (MACPS):-
The Chairman of the National Anomaly Committee has decided to constitute a Joint Committee to deal all such aberrations and submit its report for the Government to take decision. Very soon a Joint Committee will be constituted. Affiliates are free to furnish the deficiencies of the scheme to NFIR immediately.
3. Junior drawing higher pay than the Senior :-
The Chairman has advised Railways to collect data and furnish to DOPT and Ministry of Finance for taking appropriate corrective steps.
4. Health Insurance Scheme recommended by VI CPC – Implementation of the recommendations:-
The Chairman has assured that without prior consultations, the scheme shall not be finalised and allowances such as Risk Allowance, Patient Care Allowance etc. will continue till the final decision is taken.
5. VI CPC pay fixation – Grant of another option to the staff:-
The Chairman said that the proposal for delegation of powers is under process and very soon this will be finalised.
6. Revision of medical allowance to the Pensioners :-
Under consideration. The issue is now before the Committee of the Secretaries. The Chairman has assured to see that processing is speeded up.
7. Denial of increment due to absence without pay:-
We have explained the grave implications of the Government’s. decision and demanded that the increment should be granted when the employee has put in six months qualifying service in a year. It was agreed to consider and rectify the anomalous situation.
2) Pass eligibility scale not finalised after 6th PC
3)Old pay scales e.g. 5000-8000 and 5500-9000 still used in some cases like ACRs ?
Most of the staff who have joined in Group D and the lowest grade in Group C are not eligible to attain the fruits of MACP, this issue may please be given due preference in Anomaly committee meeting to be held in June 2010.
In case of Railway staff the Pass Eligibility has not yet been decided by Railway Board even after 4 years of 6th CPC has come into effect. The staff is getting restless in this regard.
It is requested to expedite the above points by making use of your good offices Raghavaiah Sir.
Sharada Kapoor, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communications & IT
2.Is there any chace to admit 4600/- grade pay for senior auditors serving in Defence Accounts Dept.wit a basic 5500/- in pre revised scale?
If both of you are in same seniority list you can apply for stepping up.Ministry of railways already issued circular in this effect with permission of finance ministry. This order is applicale for all departments.In NAC meeting unions demanded minimum pay of direct recrities for promoties which was old practice. But official side refused to accept this claim.Only solution is apply for stepping up if any junior drawing more pay.Any way you are lucky that you got one such junior to point out.ABDUL
I was appointed as a Staff Nurse wef 31 Dec 2005 in the pre revised pay scale of Rs. 5000-8000 in India Railway and further my pay under RPR 2008 has been fixed @ Rs. 9580/- with grade pay of Rs. 4600/- wef 01 Jan 2006 with no additional increment of B Sc. Nursing Degree. Similary one of the employee who was appointed on Mar 2006 at inter Zone in India Railway, his pay under RPR 2008 has been fixed @ Rs. 13590/- with Grade pay of Rs. 4600/- Total Rs. 18190/- including two additional increment of B. Sc. Nursing Degree. we both are belonging to the same cadre/post in which appoited and are in idential,
Sir can i stteped up my pay with junior who appointed in Mar/ Aug 2006 in indian railway inter Zone? if no, kindly take necessary action on abvoe as i have to less draw Rs. 4010/- as Basic pay wef Mar/Aug 2006 with no fault of mine.
If u cannot fight from pay anomaly committee then please leave/resign your post and all suffers fight from the Court.
Please immediate consider it.
as per Rule 8 for Direct recruitment the Pay fixation is being done two ways....
(i) As per Table in schedule II Pay in pay band plus grade pay for direct recruits as applicable to particular post;
(ii) for direct recruits but existing government servant the new pay fixed shall be higher of either (i) above /or (i) above and difference of (BP+DP+DA) on day of Direct recruitment) minus (PayinPayBand+DA thereon)
But our pay Controlling authorities have ignored the (ii)above and added an increment just as promotion post 1.1.06 before1.1.08
can anybody highlight on this issue
As per my understanding officially no order has been issued for granding one increament to staff whose increament falls from january 2006 to june.Chance of geting this benifit to those opted for 6th pc benifit after 1st jan 2006 seems as bleak.
Please check the date in the post heading
National Anomaly Committee Meeting Conclusions and Discussions 31.6.2010
since i think LCD/UDC are mostly qualified graduate and they are getting only 8200 pay + 2400 Grade pay i am asking what is doing NAC to rectify above anomaly. Please Reply
No orders seems to have been issued till date.
The direct recriuts joining in Feb 1992 are getting less pay than direct recruit Jan 1993 Central Excise Inspectors due to faulty Implementation of ACP scheme and are at a permanent loss.
Kindly ensure that meeting of NAC is held at a regular interval so that machinery to take decision could be mobilized
I was appointed in Dec 1987 (KVS, M/o HRD, Govt of India) (Shifted to Autonomous organisation under M/o MSME, Govt of India in the year Dec 1989, through proper channel) in the scale of 1400-40- and got the promotion in the year Oct 2001 in the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 (Group B post). I will be completing 23 years by Dec 2010, So far I have not got any ACP/MACP except one promotion in Oct 2001. Now I am in the Grade pay of Rs 4200/-. When I will get ACP/MACP and scale of Pay after up gradation. As per Government decision that employees are permitted to revise their initial option up to 31.12.2010, If I get ACP/MACP, can I avail the revised option, so that I can get pay scale (8000 old scale) with Grade Pay of Rs 5400/-. Pl reply.
N. Murali Kishore (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Anomaly due to postponement of increment in the case of those whose increment has fallen from February to June, 2006 have not been issued. Mr. Raghavaiah, I would request you to kindly follow it up at the earliest.
why teachers are not given benifit of 10-20-30 in kvs
I have been promoted as Principal and joined the post on 24/10/2005 in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan. My pay has been fixed at Rs.10,000/- in pre-revised scale and subsequent revised on implementation of 6th pay commission under section-I, Part-B w.e.f. 1.1.2006 to Rs.18600/- (PB-3)with Grade Pay of Rs.7600/- and implementation of section-II part-A, Schedule-I of CCS (RP) Rules 2008 in PB-3 for employees appointed on or after 1.1.2006 in the Pay band -3, Grade pay Rs. 7600/- has been fixed minimum entry of pay of Rs. 21900/-
Thus the employee appointed on or after 1.1.2006 are drawing higher pay.
Sir, kindly convey the decision of the pay anomonaly commission regarding protection of my pay from my juniors who have been appointed on or after 1.1.2006 and drawing higher pay.
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO.2,
AIR FORCE STATION,
DISTT. SRIGANGANAGAR (RAJ)
I am a DAE employee and was promotted from tradesman C to D in nov. 2006 at that time minimum time for next promotion from D to E/F-1 (GRADE PAY 4200)was 3 years (Merit based promotion is in dae).My colleague who is just one year senior to me got promotted in 2008(Minimum time ) but after it 6CPC came and minimum time for promotion from tradesman D to F(GRADE PAY 4200 ) was increased now it became 5 years instead of 3.As we completed 5 years and were being sent for promotion a new order came that minimum time for promotion is as it was in earlier order means 3 years .Now me and my 2 years junior coligue were sent for promotin for the same grade pay (from 2800 to 4200).By this order my junior got promotion in 3 years and myself in 5 years .Now a new order is that our 2 years will be deducted from the minimum time for next promotion(IF APAR IS A1 ). From this way our 2 years will be covered but what about our FINANCIAL LOSS of 2 years salary(As we got salary in 2800 GRADE PAY FOR LAST 2 YEARS instead of 4200 GRADE PAY).